Seen on the street in Kyiv.

Words of Advice:

"If Something Seems To Be Too Good To Be True, It's Best To Shoot It, Just In Case." -- Fiona Glenanne

“The Mob takes the Fifth. If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?” -- The TOFF *

"Foreign Relations Boil Down to Two Things: Talking With People or Killing Them." -- Unknown

“Speed is a poor substitute for accuracy.” -- Real, no-shit, fortune from a fortune cookie

"If you believe that you are talking to G-d, you can justify anything.” — my Dad

"Colt .45s; putting bad guys in the ground since 1873." -- Unknown

"Stay Strapped or Get Clapped." -- probably not Mr. Rogers

"The Dildo of Karma rarely comes lubed." -- Unknown

"Eck!" -- George the Cat

* "TOFF" = Treasonous Orange Fat Fuck, A/K/A Dolt-45,
A/K/A Commandante (or Cadet) Bone Spurs,
A/K/A El Caudillo de Mar-a-Lago, A/K/A the Asset., A/K/A P01135809

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

CCW = Safer Streets?

That seems to be the conclusion of a new study, according to the abstract:
Using data for the period 1980 to 2009 and controlling for state and year fixed effects, the results of the present study suggest that states with restrictions on the carrying of concealed weapons had higher gun-related murder rates than other states.
It costs $40 to download a full copy, which is a little too rich for my blood. (Update: Thanks to a reader, I've seen a copy. I can't stress this enough: Save Your Money!)

My instinct is that CCW doesn't as much deter crime as redirect it. Crimes against people would be less attractive to criminals if there is a risk of coming down with a sudden case of bullet wounds.* Your average criminal is pretty much a lazy (and stupid) sociopath who can't or won't hold down a job. They'll turn to shoplifting and boosting parked cars, where there is a lessened chance of getting shot for their efforts.
_________________________________________
* It's probably why there have been reports that home invasions and burglaries of occupied homes are far more common in the UK than they are in the US.

(H/T)

7 comments:

Murphy's Law said...

Your theory matches some of John Lott's earlier work, including interviews with prisoners. When CCW hits an area, they either take up new crimes which lessen the risk of meeting an armed citizen, or else they move to areas that don't allow CCW. They don't stop being criminals--they just redirect.

bmq215 said...

Not sure one can draw too many conclusions from the article. Based on my read it's pretty poorly done (statistically speaking). $40 for ~ 2 pages of content is absurd.

Check your email.

Comrade Misfit said...

bmq215, thanks for doing that.

(I think that you got ripped off. A buck-fifty would have been a fair price for that.)

bmq215 said...

No problem. Luckily I'm in a situation where I didn't have to pay a thing for it. The whole idea of charging ridiculous amounts for academic articles smacks of elitism.

CenterPuke88 said...

Just wondering if suicide and murder/suicide totals were removed from the study.

Joe said...

How did they account for the arrow of causality? My first instinct would be to suppose that high murder rates would inspire people to vote for tighter gun restrictions.

bmq215 said...

CenterPuke, they use the "murder rates" in the "Supplementary Homicide Reports" from the DOJ. I'm not certain, but from digging around a bit it seems like this includes murder-suicides but not suicide alone. I'm unsure whether the former includes the suicidee in the count.

Joe, they didn't. Instead they simply ended with "The most violent states may also have the
toughest gun control measures. Further research is warranted
in this area." Pretty lame study, all things considered.